O seguinte ARTICLE LOOKS IN DETAIL THE FALSE SERVANT FOR VIRTUAL WORLD PRESS GLOBAL COMMUNICATION TOOLS WITH MORE AND MORE POWERFUL. WHEN IS THAT MOST PEOPLE WILL BE FREE OF THIS AREA OF THE MEDIA IN A MINORITY OF POWERFUL FAMILIES IN CONNECTION WITH EACH OTHER NEWS AGENCIES AND "UNIONS" ARTICULISTASA OF SERVICE OF THE CAMPAIGNS OF THE VIEW THAT HOLD THE SITUATIONS MORE UNFAVORABLE FOR LARGE BULK SOCIAL? ARTICLE REFERS TO THE CASE Venezuelans in which they can VIVARO UPSIDE DOWN ALL THE FACTS. COMMON PEOPLE TO SEE IF YOU GET IN VIOLENT EMOTIONAL STATE AGAINST DICTATORSHIP VENZOELANA WITHOUT idea PASSING THIS COUNTRY. SOME PEOPLE WHO KNOW OF GOODWILL CAN FIND BEST INFOMAÇÃO FACE OF LIGHT ENOUGH ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY THE ARTICLE THAT YOU KNOW THE SITUATION WELL. I AM AN OLD FRIEND FROM VENEZUELA AND I AM A VERY RESPECTED AND READ THAT COUNTRY. BEEN THERE SEVERAL TIMES SINCE 1969 IN CONTACT WITH SEVERAL MORE political and theoretical trends. THERE IS MY WORK PUBLISHED MORE THAN BRAZIL. I CAN ONLY horrifies me with the amount of outright lies THE BIG PRESS ABOUT INVENT REVOLUTIONARY PROCESS DEVELOPS WITH THEM WITH GREAT PEOPLE AND A SUPPORT PROCESS conscientization WONDERFUL ESPECIALLY THE POPULAR CLASSES. SOMEDAY I'LL TELL YOU SOME STORIES FOR READERS OF MY BLOG. BUT READ THIS Artigas É COM MUITO BOA enlightening and Apresentação DE FONTES FOR FUNAMENTAR Observações SUAS.
Venezuela was also a postal
Thierry Deronne
larevolucionvive.org.ve
At the dawn of 2011 overwhelmed the contrast between France and Venezuela. CEVIPOF, research laboratory linked to the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), indicates that only 38% of French people still rely on its members and that 57% believe that democracy does not work good "or" no work at all ", 39% expressed" distrust "23%" gross "and 12%" boredom "in relation to politics (1).
At the same time the independent Chilean NGO Latinobarómetro Venezuela ranks as one of Latin America where more people trust in democracy (84% of (a) s citizens (a) s). The researchers attribute this record of confidence in the practical effect of social and economic policy expected by the population (2).
Two polls in January 2011 among which the Datanalisis - Company close to the opposition - showed that the popularity of President Hugo Chávez is located between 50 and 54%. This is due inter alia to the energetic measures for the victims of the catastrophic floods in recent months and real estate scams and increased social spending. To Latinobarometro "is paradoxical that it is in Venezuela, where more people believe in democracy and is at the same time the most criticized country in the state of their democracy."
perfect example of this "paradox" is the text published by the French newspaper "Le Monde" on February 2, 2011 under the title "A parliament useless" (3). Its author, Jean-Pierre Langellier, no research in Venezuela but merely to translate from outside the headlines right-wing majority in this country. As a preface the author expresses emotion empathy with a minority that the media essentially recruit middle and upper class. These pots fifteen minutes of "noisy", the "echo multiplied from tower to tower," this "scandal", the "noise" that seem to excite Mr. Langellier sometimes from CD in which the vessels are in pre loop real pots and sometimes a Stoic is used to knock on the window following instructions from their employers, before saving your uniform and go home in the neighborhood where 80% of the population of Venezuela received the news by Globovision, failing to read "Le Monde" that the country "said masse to demand the departure of the dictator. " The procedure is obvious: Mr. Langellier try to install the head of his readers, instead of the real Venezuela, a "virtual Egypt."
According to him, "in September 2010, the president did not prevent the victory of their opponents who gathered almost 53% of the vote. A "charcuteo" prior constituencies held his progress. " Is false. The results of the National Electoral Council were validated as provided by all international observers.
The "charcuteo" denouncing Mr. Langellier, is the electoral law adopted by the National Assembly and accepted by all parties before measuring in the race. Of the total of 165 seats in the PSUV achieved 98, against 65 for the heterogeneous coordination of the opposition. With its mix of majority voting and proportional electoral law is perfectible. In the populous state of Zulia she created a sub-representation of the Bolivarian camp, despite reaching 44.4% of the vote, won only two of the twelve elected members.
Mr. Langellier take their wishes into reality when he states, as well as the English newspaper "El País" and almost all major media, the opposition defeated the government with 52% of the vote. This lie is right to take over the votes of smaller parties and independents who do not identify with it. Official figures show that internationally validated the Bolivarian candidates gathered 5,399,574 votes to 5,312,293 for the opposition, or about 46.23% against 45.48% of the vote. (4)
This short of the revolutionary victory in an election term expresses a mixture of impatience discontent and justified by some failures and slow changes. And while the popular sectors' access to polling stations were improved (sectors, to repeat, make up 80% of the population) are some efforts to make up who enjoy the same comforts enjoyed logistical middle class.
Secretary of the OAS (Organization of American States) José Miguel Insulza, more identified with the thesis of Washington than with those of Caracas, admitted on February 5, 2011 that "elections have taken place in recent years in Venezuela have been perfectly normal and we do not see why it would not be the case for the next "(5)
For the fact that Venezuela has provided, as does any democracy, a legal responsibility to those who are called to kill or banging through a medium, Mr. Langellier claims that "radio, television and the Internet are more strictly controlled."
is false. Journalism professor Arahonian Aram, director of the magazine "Question" and the intellectual Venezuelan Luis Britto García recall that in 2011 the opposition has 90% of power communication, from where launches derogatory epithets against the majority of the Venezuelan people - Such as "monkeys", "scum", "hordes", "toothless" and other adjectives of ethnic and social discrimination (6) as well as repeated calls to launch coup against a democratically elected president, as did the chief employers in December 2010 (7).
A study on the Venezuelan television (most influential medium in the country) by the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR, for its acronym in English) based in Washington, shows that in 2010 public television did not reach but 5.4% of the audience when private channels reached 94.5% (neutral in the case of the less politicized, radically opposed to the government of Hugo Chávez mostly) (8). The proportion is roughly the same in terms of radio and print media.
Argentine government recently enacted legislation to democratize the "estates" media. This distributes the radio-electric spectrum more evenly: 33% of the airwaves for the public sector, 33% for the community sector and 33% for the commercial sector. Then the big economic groups own the media campaigned against the "dictatorship."
"Internet censorship in Venezuela" is one of the favorite themes of the global campaign of these large groups against the Bolivarian revolution. However, even an opponent like Federico Ravell, a former director and partner of Globovisión (channel which Mr. Langellier falsely announced the imminent closure in 2009 (9)) and current manager of a news website, said in January: "So time, in all honesty, I must say that we have been thwarted "(10). La Compania Anonima Nacional Telefonos de Venezuela (CANTV), after its nationalization in 2007, has helped to democratize the services offered to Venezuelans, thus achieving an increase in Internet penetration in Venezuela of 3% in 1999 to 33% in 2010, representing an increase of almost 1,100%. In January 2011 UNESCO Prize awarded to Venezuela for creating a national network that connects and empowers Infocentros free to hundreds of thousands of citizens (a) s far excluded (a) s of the mass of information technologies (11 .) The Bolivarian government has imposed the use of FOSS in all government. One of the "gurus" of the free software community - Richard M. Stallmann - recommends consider Venezuela's progress in this sector (12). Twitter has come for all political sectors. The account of Hugo Chávez has surpassed one million readers / partners. The president can see firsthand the implementation, problems, or delays in the various social programs. (13)
ultimate irony, the only censorship against Internet was carried out from abroad for a few "Anonymous hackers" who blocked several pages of the Venezuelan State on behalf of "the fight against Chavez Internet enemy "Evidence that the global campaign of disinformation to achieve its goals!
In 2008 Mr. Langellier denounced the education law because it mentioned a critical training on the role of the media, which as he prepared "censorship of the press" (sic). Two years later nothing has happened, to the point that the opposition also campaigned on this issue, and not mention it. (14)
The "journalism" Mr. Langellier works well over the years: a medley of ad effects borrowed from the Venezuelan right-wing media, not entitled to up to readers.
"All the committees are under the control of power." Is false. Most commissions are allocated, in good democracy, the elected majority. But many artists feel concern about the appointment at the head of the culture committee of Miguel Angel Rodriguez, a pugnacious promoter of RCTV (15) - right channel which Mr. Langellier also falsely announced the closure in 2009 (16)). Rodriguez defends the return to a culture more "classical", or a little less popular participation.
Mr. Langellier said that the transmission of parliamentary debates is controlled by the power which can thus eliminate "those who disturb." Is false. On Tuesday February 8, 2011 at (a) s Venezuelan (a) s attended the live broadcast on all channels and a passionate debate. For nearly eight hours opposition MPs questioned and criticized, sometimes quite violently, Bolivarian ministers.
This session of questions and answers continued in the next few days with (a) s other member (a) s the government.
Irony of history: many of these opposition MPs were the actors in the bloody coup of April 2002 against the elected president to replace the head of the business chamber. They applauded at the time the coup decree dissolving the National Assembly. The first opposition MP questioned the government, Enrique Mendoza, who was ordered to close VTV the only public channel. Is this the same channel that conveys fully his word today, live, the entire population ...
Mr. Langellier hides the fact that the various republican institutions he describes as "Chavez" - as the Supreme Court or committees, from the legitimate decisions of an assembly elected by universal suffrage.
Because an "enabling law" approved by the deputies on the basis of the constitution to allow the president to legislate and take emergency measures for thousands of victims of catastrophic floods, Mr. Langellier seeks to convince the reader (as do all major media) that "the parliament and is useless." Is false. The parliament continues by discussing and passing laws side as usual. Venezuela never saw so much excitement of popular initiative law. Unions, peasant movements, feminist groups, victims of property scams, networks of tenants, caretakers of people: the echo bills in Congress. Citizen organizations march, debate, criticizing the existing or proposed new laws on the street, in the media, in meetings with the deputies or the president. Employment Rights Act, Act against impunity for the victims of disappearances or the torture of "democracies" prior to the election of Chavez, Law debatitida higher education throughout the country, etc. .. From 19 to 20 February almost 29,000 signatures were collected in the streets of Caracas in support of the Leasing Act will be delivered on 2 March at the Assembly. This just created a reception center for all these initiatives.
All laws that Mr. Langellier and the Venezuelan right dubbed as "Cuban package" and accusing them of "strengthening state control over society and the economy are, however, a powerful engine democratization of the system. The law of communal power, adopted by the Assembly in 2010, deepening participatory democracy. This law - which the opposition wants to delete - allows communities and community councils to make, supervise and finance public works that directly benefit the people. Over 40,000 of these community councils are already emerging as a tool but effective popular participation.
"The opposition says these laws removed the governor and mayor and is false, placed in a dynamic unit of real management. Now a governor instead of being aware of a gap and can not solve it by many problems, these communities will respond immediately within their own field, "said Ulises Daal, one of the deputies who defended the law (17).
The Bank of Communications is responsible for economic and financial organization of social character that manages, administers, transfers, financing, facilitates, captures and controls the resources. "As the country has a Central Bank and financial institutions, communities must have a bank of the communes. The people have power if you have the resources to the implementation of the projects, "Daal said. Since 2008 the transfer of state to those citizens' organizations reached ten billion dollars (18).
The new rules of the Assembly that Mr. Langellier complaint as "straitjacket" in response to a long-standing demand of Members: sufficient time to tour the constituency to meet the people and their problems. It is therefore to strengthen the mandate for which they were elected.
Political democracy, very good, but social justice? Remember, as Mr. Langellier not ever tell your readers that the UN, UNESCO, ECLAC, UNDP and FAO confirmed in their recent public reports that Venezuela has achieved significant poverty reduction has been promoting and food sovereignty health and public education, free for all, and that in twelve years of revolution has become one of the most egalitarian countries in the region (19).
final Lies Mr. Langellier takes the local right-wing campaigns on "the financial waste of the presidency." Cynically concludes: "The end of the revolution is priceless."
Unlike other presidents who gave lavish parties, the ministry's office of the presidency have foundations that give grace pensions to older adults they never contributed to social security, assistance to the sick heart operations or others whose operations are moved from the hundreds of millions and are not intended to afford an operation in countries like the U.S., providing aid to people in need. Like the rest of the state president of the republic has reduced domestic spending and just moved some of its services to receive, house, feed and support the reintegration of family socio victims of flooding in December 2010.
Maybe the disgust of the French policy comes from this grave misunderstanding of the world fueled by media exchange traded. One morning, the alarm sounds, some people emerge from silence, and no understood. As Tunisia and Egypt, Venezuela was also a postcard. In 1989 when his people protested against the IMF neoliberal measures were massacred at the direction of social democratic President Carlos Andres Perez. Some young officers "Nasserists" - including a Hugo Chávez of this, angered by the crackdown, decided to rebel at the thought of a name of Simon Bolivar as: 'Cursed be the soldier to return the weapons against his people. "
Thierry Deronne, Caracas, February 2011
